Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Im Making Money


Weezer Responds To Fan Fundraising Attempt To Get Them To Stop Making Crappy Albums

from the connecting-with-anti-fans? dept

There are so many "fan-funding" platforms, like Kickstarter, out there that involve trying to raise a certain amount via a bunch of fan pledges, where they only have to pay if they reach the goal. Usually, we see projects on those sites used for things like funding a new album or a book or something. But what about an anti- funding project? Hypebot points us to the fact that some "fans" (and perhaps I should use that word loosely) of the band Weezer are using one of those platforms to try to raise $10 million dollars to get the band Weezer to break up. The organizer is apparently upset that the band doesn't make good albums any more:


I have never been a fan of this band. I think that they are pretty much horrible, and always have been. Even in the early 90's.



But this isn't about me. This is about the Weezer fans. They are our brothers and sisters, our friends, our lovers.



Every year, Rivers Cuomo swears that he's changed, and that their new album is the best thing that he's done since "Pinkerton," and what happens? Another pile of crap like "Beverly Hills" or "I'm Your Daddy."



This is an abusive relationship, and it needs to stop now.



I am tired of my friends being disappointed year after year.



I am tired of endless whimsical cutesy album covers and music videos.



I'm sick of hearing about whatever this terrible (and yes, even if you like the early stuff, you should be able to admit that they are wretched now) excuse for a band is up to these days.



If all 852,000 of you (really?) who bought "Pinkerton" pitch in $12, we will meet our al.



I beg you, Weezer. Take our money and disappear.

Amusingly, one of the band members responded via Twitter saying:

if they can make it 20, we'll do the "deluxe breakup"!

Nicely done. Of course, now that it's gotten attention, the guy who originally posted it is taking it down, saying that he did it (of course) for the lulz (as if anyone thought he was serious?). Anyway, perhaps we should have tried this for our $100 million offer to have us silence Techdirt.



8 Comments | Leave a Comment..



Google made a stunning revelation this morning: the existence of a secret self-driving car project. Even more amazing: it has been in testing for months, on actual roads across California, and things seem to be running smoothly. Fans of Total Recall, Minority Report, and Knight Rider are hyperventilating at the prospects. And while the technology is likely still a long way from being widely implemented (The New York Times piece on it suggests eight years), there is one big question: why?


Google’s answer seems to be a “betterment of society” one. “We’ve always been optimistic about technology’s ability to advance society, which is why we have pushed so hard to improve the capabilities of self-driving cars beyond where they are today,” Google engineer Sebastian Thrun, who spearheaded the project (and also runs Stanford’s AI Labs, and co-invented Street View), writes today.


That’s great. But Google is still a public company in the business of making money for its shareholders. So one can’t help but wonder what, if any, money-making prospects there are here?


The Google researchers said the company did not yet have a clear plan to create a business from the experiments,” according to the NYT. Further, they quote Thrun as saying that this project is an example of Google’s “willingness to gamble on technology that may not pay off for years.”


We know Google has a history of idealism — co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page, in particular — but this project cannot come cheap. And the fact is that Google remains basically a one-trick-pony when it comes to making money. They are so reliant on search advertising revenues, that if something suddenly happened to the market, they’d be totally screwed. Android may prove to be their second trick, but it’s not there yet.


But there may be more to these automated cars than just an awesomely cool concept. At our TechCrunch Disrupt event a couple weeks ago, Google CEO Eric Schmidt gave a speech about “an augmented version of humanity.” He noted that the future is about getting computers to do the things we’re not good at. One of those things is driving cars, Schmidt slyly said at the time. “Your car should drive itself. It just makes sense,” he noted. “It’s a bug that cars were invented before computers.


If your car can drive itself, a lot of commuters would be freed up to do other things in the car — such as surf the web. One of Google’s stated goals for this project is to “free up people’s time”. That matched with Schmidt’s vision of mobile devices being with us all the time every day, likely will translate into more usage of Google.


That may sound silly and not worth all the R&D an undertaking as huge as this will require, but don’t underestimate Google. This is a company who cares deeply about shaving fractions of a second off of each search query so that you can do more of them in your waking hours. Imagine if you suddenly had an hour or more a day in your car to do whatever you wanted because you no longer had to focus on driving? Yeah. Cha-ching.



Or imagine if your on-board maps where showing you Google ads. Or you were watching Google TV in your car since you didn’t have to drive. Or you were listening to Google Music with Google ads. It’s all the same. This automated driving technology would free you up to use more Google products — which in turn make them more money. Make no mistake, Google will enter your car in a big way. And automated driving would up their return in a big way.


And, of course, none of this speaks to what, if anything, Google would actually charge for such technology implementation. You would have to believe that if and when it’s available, this automated driving tech would be built-in to cars. Would car manufacturers pay Google for it and pass off some of the costs to customers? Or would this all be subsidized by the above ideas?


It’s way too early to get into that, I’m sure. And in 8 years, there will be things out there that we can’t even imagine right now. But it’s interesting to think about. The Google Car.


Now, don’t get me wrong, I have little doubt Google is being sincere in their broader hopes for such a technology. Here’s their key blurb on that:


According to the World Health Organization, more than 1.2 million lives are lost every year in road traffic accidents. We believe our technology has the potential to cut that number, perhaps by as much as half. We’re also confident that self-driving cars will transform car sharing, significantly reducing car usage, as well as help create the new “highway trains of tomorrow.” These highway trains should cut energy consumption while also increasing the number of people that can be transported on our major roads. In terms of time efficiency, the U.S. Department of Transportation estimates that people spend on average 52 minutes each working day commuting. Imagine being able to spend that time more productively.


That first part is awesome. If we could halve the number of traffic deaths each year, it would be world-changing. And if energy consumption could be cut, it could re-shape economies and save our future. But again, don’t gloss over the last part. Freeing up those 52 minutes a day to be productive — that’s a lot of potential money for Google.


And that’s great too. If Google can spend the time and money working on such amazing technology they should be rewarded for it. There’s no rule that says you shouldn’t be able to make money by changing the world. And Google can’t be praised enough for trying.


More:



  • Google Has A Secret Fleet Of Automated Toyota Priuses; 140,000 Miles Logged So Far.

  • Google’s Self-Driving Car Spotted On The Highway Almost A Year Ago 



[images: Dreamworks and TriStar Entertainment]



robert shumake detroit

Election 2010: NBC <b>News</b>, MSNBC Slate Midterm Coverage Plans - TVNewser

New York – October 18, 2010 – NBC News will offer comprehensive coverage of the upcoming 2010 mid-term elections on Nov. 2 across all its platforms, including msnbc, Msnbc.com, Telemundo, NBC News Radio and NBC News Mobile. ...

Watershed debuts Waterproof Bag for iPad | iLounge <b>News</b>

iLounge news discussing the Watershed debuts Waterproof Bag for iPad. Find more iPad Accessories news from leading independent iPod, iPhone, and iPad site.

Mavericks to give McCants a look-see | Dallas Mavericks Blog <b>...</b>

Dallas Mavericks Blog - Dallasnews.com's Dallas Mavericks coverage includes the latest news, notes, commentary, analysis, blogs, e-mail newsletters, photos and videos of the Mavericks.


robert shumake hall of shame

Weezer Responds To Fan Fundraising Attempt To Get Them To Stop Making Crappy Albums

from the connecting-with-anti-fans? dept

There are so many "fan-funding" platforms, like Kickstarter, out there that involve trying to raise a certain amount via a bunch of fan pledges, where they only have to pay if they reach the goal. Usually, we see projects on those sites used for things like funding a new album or a book or something. But what about an anti- funding project? Hypebot points us to the fact that some "fans" (and perhaps I should use that word loosely) of the band Weezer are using one of those platforms to try to raise $10 million dollars to get the band Weezer to break up. The organizer is apparently upset that the band doesn't make good albums any more:


I have never been a fan of this band. I think that they are pretty much horrible, and always have been. Even in the early 90's.



But this isn't about me. This is about the Weezer fans. They are our brothers and sisters, our friends, our lovers.



Every year, Rivers Cuomo swears that he's changed, and that their new album is the best thing that he's done since "Pinkerton," and what happens? Another pile of crap like "Beverly Hills" or "I'm Your Daddy."



This is an abusive relationship, and it needs to stop now.



I am tired of my friends being disappointed year after year.



I am tired of endless whimsical cutesy album covers and music videos.



I'm sick of hearing about whatever this terrible (and yes, even if you like the early stuff, you should be able to admit that they are wretched now) excuse for a band is up to these days.



If all 852,000 of you (really?) who bought "Pinkerton" pitch in $12, we will meet our al.



I beg you, Weezer. Take our money and disappear.

Amusingly, one of the band members responded via Twitter saying:

if they can make it 20, we'll do the "deluxe breakup"!

Nicely done. Of course, now that it's gotten attention, the guy who originally posted it is taking it down, saying that he did it (of course) for the lulz (as if anyone thought he was serious?). Anyway, perhaps we should have tried this for our $100 million offer to have us silence Techdirt.



8 Comments | Leave a Comment..



Google made a stunning revelation this morning: the existence of a secret self-driving car project. Even more amazing: it has been in testing for months, on actual roads across California, and things seem to be running smoothly. Fans of Total Recall, Minority Report, and Knight Rider are hyperventilating at the prospects. And while the technology is likely still a long way from being widely implemented (The New York Times piece on it suggests eight years), there is one big question: why?


Google’s answer seems to be a “betterment of society” one. “We’ve always been optimistic about technology’s ability to advance society, which is why we have pushed so hard to improve the capabilities of self-driving cars beyond where they are today,” Google engineer Sebastian Thrun, who spearheaded the project (and also runs Stanford’s AI Labs, and co-invented Street View), writes today.


That’s great. But Google is still a public company in the business of making money for its shareholders. So one can’t help but wonder what, if any, money-making prospects there are here?


The Google researchers said the company did not yet have a clear plan to create a business from the experiments,” according to the NYT. Further, they quote Thrun as saying that this project is an example of Google’s “willingness to gamble on technology that may not pay off for years.”


We know Google has a history of idealism — co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page, in particular — but this project cannot come cheap. And the fact is that Google remains basically a one-trick-pony when it comes to making money. They are so reliant on search advertising revenues, that if something suddenly happened to the market, they’d be totally screwed. Android may prove to be their second trick, but it’s not there yet.


But there may be more to these automated cars than just an awesomely cool concept. At our TechCrunch Disrupt event a couple weeks ago, Google CEO Eric Schmidt gave a speech about “an augmented version of humanity.” He noted that the future is about getting computers to do the things we’re not good at. One of those things is driving cars, Schmidt slyly said at the time. “Your car should drive itself. It just makes sense,” he noted. “It’s a bug that cars were invented before computers.


If your car can drive itself, a lot of commuters would be freed up to do other things in the car — such as surf the web. One of Google’s stated goals for this project is to “free up people’s time”. That matched with Schmidt’s vision of mobile devices being with us all the time every day, likely will translate into more usage of Google.


That may sound silly and not worth all the R&D an undertaking as huge as this will require, but don’t underestimate Google. This is a company who cares deeply about shaving fractions of a second off of each search query so that you can do more of them in your waking hours. Imagine if you suddenly had an hour or more a day in your car to do whatever you wanted because you no longer had to focus on driving? Yeah. Cha-ching.



Or imagine if your on-board maps where showing you Google ads. Or you were watching Google TV in your car since you didn’t have to drive. Or you were listening to Google Music with Google ads. It’s all the same. This automated driving technology would free you up to use more Google products — which in turn make them more money. Make no mistake, Google will enter your car in a big way. And automated driving would up their return in a big way.


And, of course, none of this speaks to what, if anything, Google would actually charge for such technology implementation. You would have to believe that if and when it’s available, this automated driving tech would be built-in to cars. Would car manufacturers pay Google for it and pass off some of the costs to customers? Or would this all be subsidized by the above ideas?


It’s way too early to get into that, I’m sure. And in 8 years, there will be things out there that we can’t even imagine right now. But it’s interesting to think about. The Google Car.


Now, don’t get me wrong, I have little doubt Google is being sincere in their broader hopes for such a technology. Here’s their key blurb on that:


According to the World Health Organization, more than 1.2 million lives are lost every year in road traffic accidents. We believe our technology has the potential to cut that number, perhaps by as much as half. We’re also confident that self-driving cars will transform car sharing, significantly reducing car usage, as well as help create the new “highway trains of tomorrow.” These highway trains should cut energy consumption while also increasing the number of people that can be transported on our major roads. In terms of time efficiency, the U.S. Department of Transportation estimates that people spend on average 52 minutes each working day commuting. Imagine being able to spend that time more productively.


That first part is awesome. If we could halve the number of traffic deaths each year, it would be world-changing. And if energy consumption could be cut, it could re-shape economies and save our future. But again, don’t gloss over the last part. Freeing up those 52 minutes a day to be productive — that’s a lot of potential money for Google.


And that’s great too. If Google can spend the time and money working on such amazing technology they should be rewarded for it. There’s no rule that says you shouldn’t be able to make money by changing the world. And Google can’t be praised enough for trying.


More:



  • Google Has A Secret Fleet Of Automated Toyota Priuses; 140,000 Miles Logged So Far.

  • Google’s Self-Driving Car Spotted On The Highway Almost A Year Ago 



[images: Dreamworks and TriStar Entertainment]



benchcraft company portland or

Election 2010: NBC <b>News</b>, MSNBC Slate Midterm Coverage Plans - TVNewser

New York – October 18, 2010 – NBC News will offer comprehensive coverage of the upcoming 2010 mid-term elections on Nov. 2 across all its platforms, including msnbc, Msnbc.com, Telemundo, NBC News Radio and NBC News Mobile. ...

Watershed debuts Waterproof Bag for iPad | iLounge <b>News</b>

iLounge news discussing the Watershed debuts Waterproof Bag for iPad. Find more iPad Accessories news from leading independent iPod, iPhone, and iPad site.

Mavericks to give McCants a look-see | Dallas Mavericks Blog <b>...</b>

Dallas Mavericks Blog - Dallasnews.com's Dallas Mavericks coverage includes the latest news, notes, commentary, analysis, blogs, e-mail newsletters, photos and videos of the Mavericks.


robert shumake hall of shame

robert shumake hall of shame

gina-crop-small by gina.gaudio.graves


robert shumake hall of shame

Election 2010: NBC <b>News</b>, MSNBC Slate Midterm Coverage Plans - TVNewser

New York – October 18, 2010 – NBC News will offer comprehensive coverage of the upcoming 2010 mid-term elections on Nov. 2 across all its platforms, including msnbc, Msnbc.com, Telemundo, NBC News Radio and NBC News Mobile. ...

Watershed debuts Waterproof Bag for iPad | iLounge <b>News</b>

iLounge news discussing the Watershed debuts Waterproof Bag for iPad. Find more iPad Accessories news from leading independent iPod, iPhone, and iPad site.

Mavericks to give McCants a look-see | Dallas Mavericks Blog <b>...</b>

Dallas Mavericks Blog - Dallasnews.com's Dallas Mavericks coverage includes the latest news, notes, commentary, analysis, blogs, e-mail newsletters, photos and videos of the Mavericks.


robert shumake hall of shame

Weezer Responds To Fan Fundraising Attempt To Get Them To Stop Making Crappy Albums

from the connecting-with-anti-fans? dept

There are so many "fan-funding" platforms, like Kickstarter, out there that involve trying to raise a certain amount via a bunch of fan pledges, where they only have to pay if they reach the goal. Usually, we see projects on those sites used for things like funding a new album or a book or something. But what about an anti- funding project? Hypebot points us to the fact that some "fans" (and perhaps I should use that word loosely) of the band Weezer are using one of those platforms to try to raise $10 million dollars to get the band Weezer to break up. The organizer is apparently upset that the band doesn't make good albums any more:


I have never been a fan of this band. I think that they are pretty much horrible, and always have been. Even in the early 90's.



But this isn't about me. This is about the Weezer fans. They are our brothers and sisters, our friends, our lovers.



Every year, Rivers Cuomo swears that he's changed, and that their new album is the best thing that he's done since "Pinkerton," and what happens? Another pile of crap like "Beverly Hills" or "I'm Your Daddy."



This is an abusive relationship, and it needs to stop now.



I am tired of my friends being disappointed year after year.



I am tired of endless whimsical cutesy album covers and music videos.



I'm sick of hearing about whatever this terrible (and yes, even if you like the early stuff, you should be able to admit that they are wretched now) excuse for a band is up to these days.



If all 852,000 of you (really?) who bought "Pinkerton" pitch in $12, we will meet our al.



I beg you, Weezer. Take our money and disappear.

Amusingly, one of the band members responded via Twitter saying:

if they can make it 20, we'll do the "deluxe breakup"!

Nicely done. Of course, now that it's gotten attention, the guy who originally posted it is taking it down, saying that he did it (of course) for the lulz (as if anyone thought he was serious?). Anyway, perhaps we should have tried this for our $100 million offer to have us silence Techdirt.



8 Comments | Leave a Comment..



Google made a stunning revelation this morning: the existence of a secret self-driving car project. Even more amazing: it has been in testing for months, on actual roads across California, and things seem to be running smoothly. Fans of Total Recall, Minority Report, and Knight Rider are hyperventilating at the prospects. And while the technology is likely still a long way from being widely implemented (The New York Times piece on it suggests eight years), there is one big question: why?


Google’s answer seems to be a “betterment of society” one. “We’ve always been optimistic about technology’s ability to advance society, which is why we have pushed so hard to improve the capabilities of self-driving cars beyond where they are today,” Google engineer Sebastian Thrun, who spearheaded the project (and also runs Stanford’s AI Labs, and co-invented Street View), writes today.


That’s great. But Google is still a public company in the business of making money for its shareholders. So one can’t help but wonder what, if any, money-making prospects there are here?


The Google researchers said the company did not yet have a clear plan to create a business from the experiments,” according to the NYT. Further, they quote Thrun as saying that this project is an example of Google’s “willingness to gamble on technology that may not pay off for years.”


We know Google has a history of idealism — co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page, in particular — but this project cannot come cheap. And the fact is that Google remains basically a one-trick-pony when it comes to making money. They are so reliant on search advertising revenues, that if something suddenly happened to the market, they’d be totally screwed. Android may prove to be their second trick, but it’s not there yet.


But there may be more to these automated cars than just an awesomely cool concept. At our TechCrunch Disrupt event a couple weeks ago, Google CEO Eric Schmidt gave a speech about “an augmented version of humanity.” He noted that the future is about getting computers to do the things we’re not good at. One of those things is driving cars, Schmidt slyly said at the time. “Your car should drive itself. It just makes sense,” he noted. “It’s a bug that cars were invented before computers.


If your car can drive itself, a lot of commuters would be freed up to do other things in the car — such as surf the web. One of Google’s stated goals for this project is to “free up people’s time”. That matched with Schmidt’s vision of mobile devices being with us all the time every day, likely will translate into more usage of Google.


That may sound silly and not worth all the R&D an undertaking as huge as this will require, but don’t underestimate Google. This is a company who cares deeply about shaving fractions of a second off of each search query so that you can do more of them in your waking hours. Imagine if you suddenly had an hour or more a day in your car to do whatever you wanted because you no longer had to focus on driving? Yeah. Cha-ching.



Or imagine if your on-board maps where showing you Google ads. Or you were watching Google TV in your car since you didn’t have to drive. Or you were listening to Google Music with Google ads. It’s all the same. This automated driving technology would free you up to use more Google products — which in turn make them more money. Make no mistake, Google will enter your car in a big way. And automated driving would up their return in a big way.


And, of course, none of this speaks to what, if anything, Google would actually charge for such technology implementation. You would have to believe that if and when it’s available, this automated driving tech would be built-in to cars. Would car manufacturers pay Google for it and pass off some of the costs to customers? Or would this all be subsidized by the above ideas?


It’s way too early to get into that, I’m sure. And in 8 years, there will be things out there that we can’t even imagine right now. But it’s interesting to think about. The Google Car.


Now, don’t get me wrong, I have little doubt Google is being sincere in their broader hopes for such a technology. Here’s their key blurb on that:


According to the World Health Organization, more than 1.2 million lives are lost every year in road traffic accidents. We believe our technology has the potential to cut that number, perhaps by as much as half. We’re also confident that self-driving cars will transform car sharing, significantly reducing car usage, as well as help create the new “highway trains of tomorrow.” These highway trains should cut energy consumption while also increasing the number of people that can be transported on our major roads. In terms of time efficiency, the U.S. Department of Transportation estimates that people spend on average 52 minutes each working day commuting. Imagine being able to spend that time more productively.


That first part is awesome. If we could halve the number of traffic deaths each year, it would be world-changing. And if energy consumption could be cut, it could re-shape economies and save our future. But again, don’t gloss over the last part. Freeing up those 52 minutes a day to be productive — that’s a lot of potential money for Google.


And that’s great too. If Google can spend the time and money working on such amazing technology they should be rewarded for it. There’s no rule that says you shouldn’t be able to make money by changing the world. And Google can’t be praised enough for trying.


More:



  • Google Has A Secret Fleet Of Automated Toyota Priuses; 140,000 Miles Logged So Far.

  • Google’s Self-Driving Car Spotted On The Highway Almost A Year Ago 



[images: Dreamworks and TriStar Entertainment]



robert shumake hall of shame

gina-crop-small by gina.gaudio.graves


robert shumake twitter

Election 2010: NBC <b>News</b>, MSNBC Slate Midterm Coverage Plans - TVNewser

New York – October 18, 2010 – NBC News will offer comprehensive coverage of the upcoming 2010 mid-term elections on Nov. 2 across all its platforms, including msnbc, Msnbc.com, Telemundo, NBC News Radio and NBC News Mobile. ...

Watershed debuts Waterproof Bag for iPad | iLounge <b>News</b>

iLounge news discussing the Watershed debuts Waterproof Bag for iPad. Find more iPad Accessories news from leading independent iPod, iPhone, and iPad site.

Mavericks to give McCants a look-see | Dallas Mavericks Blog <b>...</b>

Dallas Mavericks Blog - Dallasnews.com's Dallas Mavericks coverage includes the latest news, notes, commentary, analysis, blogs, e-mail newsletters, photos and videos of the Mavericks.


robert shumake hall of shame

gina-crop-small by gina.gaudio.graves


robert shumake hall of shame

Election 2010: NBC <b>News</b>, MSNBC Slate Midterm Coverage Plans - TVNewser

New York – October 18, 2010 – NBC News will offer comprehensive coverage of the upcoming 2010 mid-term elections on Nov. 2 across all its platforms, including msnbc, Msnbc.com, Telemundo, NBC News Radio and NBC News Mobile. ...

Watershed debuts Waterproof Bag for iPad | iLounge <b>News</b>

iLounge news discussing the Watershed debuts Waterproof Bag for iPad. Find more iPad Accessories news from leading independent iPod, iPhone, and iPad site.

Mavericks to give McCants a look-see | Dallas Mavericks Blog <b>...</b>

Dallas Mavericks Blog - Dallasnews.com's Dallas Mavericks coverage includes the latest news, notes, commentary, analysis, blogs, e-mail newsletters, photos and videos of the Mavericks.


robert shumake twitter

Election 2010: NBC <b>News</b>, MSNBC Slate Midterm Coverage Plans - TVNewser

New York – October 18, 2010 – NBC News will offer comprehensive coverage of the upcoming 2010 mid-term elections on Nov. 2 across all its platforms, including msnbc, Msnbc.com, Telemundo, NBC News Radio and NBC News Mobile. ...

Watershed debuts Waterproof Bag for iPad | iLounge <b>News</b>

iLounge news discussing the Watershed debuts Waterproof Bag for iPad. Find more iPad Accessories news from leading independent iPod, iPhone, and iPad site.

Mavericks to give McCants a look-see | Dallas Mavericks Blog <b>...</b>

Dallas Mavericks Blog - Dallasnews.com's Dallas Mavericks coverage includes the latest news, notes, commentary, analysis, blogs, e-mail newsletters, photos and videos of the Mavericks.


robert shumake hall of shame

Election 2010: NBC <b>News</b>, MSNBC Slate Midterm Coverage Plans - TVNewser

New York – October 18, 2010 – NBC News will offer comprehensive coverage of the upcoming 2010 mid-term elections on Nov. 2 across all its platforms, including msnbc, Msnbc.com, Telemundo, NBC News Radio and NBC News Mobile. ...

Watershed debuts Waterproof Bag for iPad | iLounge <b>News</b>

iLounge news discussing the Watershed debuts Waterproof Bag for iPad. Find more iPad Accessories news from leading independent iPod, iPhone, and iPad site.

Mavericks to give McCants a look-see | Dallas Mavericks Blog <b>...</b>

Dallas Mavericks Blog - Dallasnews.com's Dallas Mavericks coverage includes the latest news, notes, commentary, analysis, blogs, e-mail newsletters, photos and videos of the Mavericks.


how to lose weight fast robert shumake detroit
robert shumake hall of shame

gina-crop-small by gina.gaudio.graves


robert shumake hall of shame
robert shumake hall of shame

Election 2010: NBC <b>News</b>, MSNBC Slate Midterm Coverage Plans - TVNewser

New York – October 18, 2010 – NBC News will offer comprehensive coverage of the upcoming 2010 mid-term elections on Nov. 2 across all its platforms, including msnbc, Msnbc.com, Telemundo, NBC News Radio and NBC News Mobile. ...

Watershed debuts Waterproof Bag for iPad | iLounge <b>News</b>

iLounge news discussing the Watershed debuts Waterproof Bag for iPad. Find more iPad Accessories news from leading independent iPod, iPhone, and iPad site.

Mavericks to give McCants a look-see | Dallas Mavericks Blog <b>...</b>

Dallas Mavericks Blog - Dallasnews.com's Dallas Mavericks coverage includes the latest news, notes, commentary, analysis, blogs, e-mail newsletters, photos and videos of the Mavericks.


robert shumake twitter

Apple Butter

Apples probably the most desired holiday food. Apple Pie, Apple cobbler,Apple Bread, Apple Sauce, Apple Butter, Apple pumpkin Butter Etc Etc Etc.

I have to say my favorite pie is Apple then Pumpkin I make them all but maybe its the anticipation of fall that makes it all so good. Apple season I will usually make a about a dozen Pie fillings and freeeze them. Its funny I think so many people like to cook but yet they really dont cook at all. Cooking is as much about smell as it is taste. And taste of course for those of you waiting for us to get done is about anticipation. Of course to us who cook it its about much more.

Its about the oh honey the house smells so good. The umm this is really good and seeing the smile and someone saying can I have more. Can I have more a cooks favorite words the word that always puts a smile on hard work for the ones you love. A truly good cook knows this.

A friend of mine a manager for a restaurant asked me if I had a good fried chicken recipe. I was taken back because in my mind their are basics and Fried Chicken is one of them. It is so simple milk chicken flower and seasoning and of course grease. I like shake and bake but it is just so expensive. So I make my own as with peanut butter and cashew butter.

So as a tribute to my readers I will give a simple recipe for apple butter and an even simpler one for home made Shake and Bake it is the best you will taste. You can put it in the fridge and it will last forever.

Apple Butter is simple. I can make it simpler. Its about one thing cooking down the apples to a paste without burning them or the butter. Apple butter will thicken in the fridge so keep this in mind as you are cooking it down. Now to the die hard apple butter cook 3 or 4 different kinds of apples will be used. As each apple does taste different and the blend is what you want. But as with everything else its about prep time.

So here is simple way. Go to Kroger or walmart Buy 2 large jars of apple sauce 50 oz jars. This will cook down to about 8 half pint jars.

IMPORTANT IMPORTANT IMPORTANT IMPORTANT

At this time adding anything except sugar can ruin everything it will not taste the same when you start as when you finish. Cooking things down makes the spices and salts stronger so be sparing with them in the beginning.

So the easiest way to make your apple butter is with your crock pot. Empty the 2 jars into your crock pot large crock pot. Add 5 cups of sugar and turn it on high for 2 hours. This will take all day or longer depending on how thick you like your butter.

I usually cook mine down to half the volume that I started with.

Ok lets back up for a minute if you want apple sauce and apple butter you will have to start with real apple's and will need a blender or food processor.

Apple butter whether you start from whole apples or apple sauce always starts with apple sauce. SO naturally when I make my apple butter I also make apple sauce. I make my apple sauce with no sugar. So I can add it for whatever it is im making next. Some times I like it without sugar other times I add it to my apple sauce my tastes change like the weather.

Keep in mind SO if you are buying your apple sauce this can also be considerably cheaper. As apples at walmart can start in season at about a dollar fifty a pound in season. And usually cost close to the same at your local farmers market. So if you buy your apple sauce natural unsweetened it will cost you 1.86 for 3 pounds this is cheaper than fresh apples and you can not tell the difference when your done. I have done both and prefer to buy apple sauce but only if Im making butter only. Which on occasion someone wants a batch of apple butter. And you can save the big jars for something else.

Ok you will see in the recipe that their are very few actual measurements except apples and sugar. And even then the sugar isnt a stick to the recipe. I dont use many measures I have them but to me its season to taste. So I add it as I go towards the end for example I like just a hint of salt just enough to tell you its their.

Ok a little known tid bit if you take a spoon and taste your cold jams or jellies or other refrigerated foods the enzymes from your mouth will continue to break down the food when you store it thats why when you open the jelly or jam or anything else their is water in it. Its then enzymes from the human body doing their job without you. Never take a spoon twice in the food unless you use another clean spoon its not bad but it will go bad faster then if you us a clean spoon or other utensil every time.

The Basics to Apple butter are:

Apples at least 5 pounds if starting from apples buy some red and some gala and some granny smith green apples granny smith is just a name for sour apples which are used in apple pie.

This is all season to taste about an hour before you say its as thick as you like it.

Cinnamon
Ground clove
Salt
Sugar

Now you can subtract or add here some people do not like clove I do Some people replace the clove with ground nut meg some people add vanilla all of these are good and work all though be very careful with ground nutmeg I like it but a little goes a long ways. I do not use Vanilla I like vanilla but not in apple butter. This is all season to taste.

If Starting from apples peel and core the apples place in food processor and blend till smooth add water till desired texture is achieved. Wella you have apple sauce all natural no additives all natural.

Place the Apple sauce in the crock pot turn it on high for two hours then to low now if you are like me you have many other things to do so low is good it wont burn and still gets the job done. If you have nothing else to do and are just making apple butter us High it gets done faster. In 12 hours it will be cooked down enough and have enough thickness for you to add your other flavors and spices.

If you do not have a crock pot use a thick bottom pot with the burner on low and stir constantly to assure it does not burn the butter. If you intend on doing a lot of cooking at home you would be wise to buy yourself a good set of cookware. If you live in areas where their is a ross store you can buy the best piece by piece and not really save much but it takes the sting out a nice set of cookware as with knives. Its easier in the beginning to buy a good set of knives Chicago cutlery or J.A. Hinkle you can buy Hinkle at Target stores by the piece or Chicago Cutlery at walmart by the piece. These knives can be sharpened and last way longer than a cheap set if you buy either you will have them forever and most electric can openers have knife sharpeners on the back.

A good quality Knife set will set you back a minimum of 200 bucks.

Ok now to the Shake and Bake

Here is the reason you never throw away the heal in the bread and a away to use un used bread. save them till you have enough I just throw mine in the freezer and when the pile starts to bother me and take up to much space then I make my Shake and Bake or bread crumbs. All shake and Bake is is bread crumbs that have been seasoned to taste and oil but I do have a recipe which I will give you. Just remember you go to the store and pay good money for bread crumbs and shake and bake STOP That.

I usually make about for cups at a time so I save my bread in the freezer and when it gets to be to much I start toasting it. To me I like my toast a little on the burnt side so I toast for a little longer. Ok it is way to hard to take bread that has not been toasted and make bread crumbs you need to toast it then drop it in the food processor or blender and blend to crumbs.

Put it in a bowl and add your seasoning and oil toss till it is well tossed and put in the fridge wella again your done. when you need it for so chicken or pork take it out and put some in a baggy and add chicken or pork shake and put on cookie sheet. cook like you would any other meat cook your chicken till it reaches 160 degrees inside and take it out let cool and eat.

Directions for Shake and Bake

4 cups dry bread crumbs
1/3 cup vegetable oil
1 tablespoon salt
1 tablespoon paprika
1 tablespoon celery salt
1 teaspoon ground black pepper
1/2 teaspoon garlic salt
1/2 teaspoon minced garlic
1/4 teaspoon minced onion
1 pinch dried basil leaves
1 pinch dried parsley
1 pinch dried oregano

In a large bowl combine the crumbs, oil, salt, paprika, celery salt, pepper, garlic salt, minced garlic, minced onion, basil, parsley and oregano. Seal bag and shake all ingredients together. Have Fun and Merry Christmas


robert shumake hall of shame

Election 2010: NBC <b>News</b>, MSNBC Slate Midterm Coverage Plans - TVNewser

New York – October 18, 2010 – NBC News will offer comprehensive coverage of the upcoming 2010 mid-term elections on Nov. 2 across all its platforms, including msnbc, Msnbc.com, Telemundo, NBC News Radio and NBC News Mobile. ...

Watershed debuts Waterproof Bag for iPad | iLounge <b>News</b>

iLounge news discussing the Watershed debuts Waterproof Bag for iPad. Find more iPad Accessories news from leading independent iPod, iPhone, and iPad site.

Mavericks to give McCants a look-see | Dallas Mavericks Blog <b>...</b>

Dallas Mavericks Blog - Dallasnews.com's Dallas Mavericks coverage includes the latest news, notes, commentary, analysis, blogs, e-mail newsletters, photos and videos of the Mavericks.


robert shumake detroit

Election 2010: NBC <b>News</b>, MSNBC Slate Midterm Coverage Plans - TVNewser

New York – October 18, 2010 – NBC News will offer comprehensive coverage of the upcoming 2010 mid-term elections on Nov. 2 across all its platforms, including msnbc, Msnbc.com, Telemundo, NBC News Radio and NBC News Mobile. ...

Watershed debuts Waterproof Bag for iPad | iLounge <b>News</b>

iLounge news discussing the Watershed debuts Waterproof Bag for iPad. Find more iPad Accessories news from leading independent iPod, iPhone, and iPad site.

Mavericks to give McCants a look-see | Dallas Mavericks Blog <b>...</b>

Dallas Mavericks Blog - Dallasnews.com's Dallas Mavericks coverage includes the latest news, notes, commentary, analysis, blogs, e-mail newsletters, photos and videos of the Mavericks.























































No comments:

Post a Comment